If you remove NXG will it rely on Classic? This would remove the need of 2 projects which is required currently with NXG. I know it is included in NXG Community Edition but when happens when NXG goes away? Is the stand-alone Web Module going to be included in the Community am going to have to wait and see how the standalone Web Module works because currently it relies on NXG.
#Xojo google maps code#
Some examples of adding APIs to Web Module using JSLI can be found in the Example Code forum with the LabVIEW NXG Web Module tag with examples like Google Maps integration, Debugging Tools, Rich pop-up dialogs, File I/O, as for price, if the intent is for the community to use it I hope they include it in the community edition as you are right no one is going to pay for it if they are a hobby developer. In addition, similar to how you may use the Call Library Function Node to call C DLLs in LabVIEW, in the Web Module we have the JavaScript Library Interface (JSLI) to call JavaScript libraries in the browser. For the examples described of indicators, graphs, buttons, and selectors I would not expect one to have to write custom HTML, JavaScript, or CSS. Yep the goal is that for most use-cases you can use Web Module to create monitoring and control web interfaces without having to write HTML, JavaScript, and CSS yourself.
An application with a Web Module project for the web application and a LabVIEW project will continue as-is. Workflows should look very similar to today. The stand-alone web module development environment will be a subset of the NXG environment catering to the Web Module use case. I am going to have to wait and see how the standalone Web Module works because currently it relies on NXG. LabVIEW NXG Web Module is included with LabVIEW NXG Community Edition Though, I have only just experienced with this method of UI. I did fully use a JKI state machine as part of the web interface so it steams very powerful. I am not sure your point on learning HTML or java as I have not experienced that with my NXG Web interface. The whole benefit of running in a Web browser is that it is supposed to be able to be supported on every OS with 1 build. This would remove the need of 2 projects which is required currently with NXG. If you remove NXG will it rely on Classic? If so then your point about just turning your front panel into a Web interface may be true. I am interested in using it beyond the hobby level so I am not worried about price at this point. Well as for price, if the intent is for the community to use it I hope they include it in the community edition as you are right no one is going to pay for it if they are a hobby developer.
#Xojo google maps free#
Please feel free to correct me on any of the points I've raised, or engage me in an argument as to why I'm just 'not getting it' ! Currently it's listed at £820, so I can't see many Raspberry pi developers stumping up this every year.
#Xojo google maps mac#
You can also deply the same UI to IOS, Windows or Mac (although there is a charge for these builders)Īnd finally, is the NXG Web Module free ?. The Xojo solution creates a fully compiled executable which you can just call from your LabVIEW code.no messing about with hosting your UI on a browser. (and I REALLY don't want to start leaning HTML thank you) Generally though, all I need is a simple UI with a few indicators and graphs and some buttons and selector controls. If you could just migrate your LabVIEW front panel to a Web interface, then this would be great.but you have to start all over and design your UI again so no real advantage over Xojo here (perhaps the original intention was to be able to do this in LabVIEW NXG, I'm not sure)įor sure, you can probably create some really wizzy UI's.and if you are familiar with HTML and Javascript you can embed all sorts of nice stuff I suppose. Sorry, but I'm still not convinced that the NXG Web Module is the way to go.
0 kommentar(er)
